Share

Performance Management & Appraisal Help Center
Articles, Guides, Free Advice On All Aspects of Performance Improvement, Management and Appraisal
 

Home | Definitions | Performance Mgmt. and Appraisal Articles Library | Q&A KnowledgeBase | Bacal's Performance Appraisal Articles | Tools To Improve Performance | Bacal's Performance Books | Expert Articles |
Bacal & Associates - Helping Improve and Manage Performance For More Than Two Decades

 
 

Article Reprints

Articles in this section (authored by Robert Bacal, are available for reprinting for a nominal fee provided certain conditions are met. For more information about how you can use this material, please visit our Self-Service Article Reprint Center. Or, email us for help by clicking here.

On The Line

Dealing With Hostile "Bait" by Robert Bacal

Summary: Don't get suckered into arguments with difficult or angry customers. Learn how to identify the bait customers use to draw you in, waste your time, and create conflict, and learn to avoid taking the bait.


When dealing with verbal abuse or hostility from clients, it is important to be able to avoid responding to the "bait" that is placed before you.  Not only is that important, but it is also important to know exactly what you can say, when you are subject to attacks like: 

"If you really cared about my welfare, you would give me my check!" 

"You guys in government are lazy and over-paid." 

"I bet if I wasn't [ethnic group], you would give me...." 

In this On The Line, we will help you deal with these kinds of remarks.   

Some Background 

Stop Runaway Conflict By Using Your Head Instead Of Your Emotions Learn how from Using Your Head To Manage Conflict Helpcard

Once conflict starts we tend to get emotionally caught up in it, and end up handling it badly, because we over-react and stop thinking. You can learn to stop knee-jerk reactions that make conflict worse from Using Your Head To Manage Conflict Helpcard.

Learn to CHOOSE the best method and reactions for any particular conflict situation, when it's best not to engage, use power solutions, or go more "cooperative".

Free preview available. Click here for more information about how you can become more thoughtful and successful with conflict situations.

In order to deal with these kinds of attacks there are a few things that you need to understand. 

Verbal attacks follow certain patterns, and have some hidden rules.  The attacker expects you to react in particular ways.  Usually a verbal attacker will expect that you will become either defensive and intimidated, or that you will become aggressive and attack back.  Unfortunately, when you do what the attacker suggests, you give control to him or her, and increase the probability that the attack will continue.  So, the best way to stop an attack is not to take either of these actions. 

In addition, verbal attacks tend to "run off" by themselves, in an almost automatic manner.  So long as you do what is expected, the attacker is able to continue.  So, you need to do something unexpected to stop the attack. 

Also, verbal attacks contain bait.  Just like the fisherman, the attacker presents you with bait in the hope that you will swallow it and be hooked.  Bait is often unsaid, or pre-supposed.  What this means is that the attacker need not attack you directly, but need only imply certain things, without really saying anything.  Let's take an example. 

In the attack sentence "If I wasn't [ethnic group], I bet you would give me....".  If you look carefully, you won't find the insult in the words.  Still, most people will react to the hidden bait...the implied suggestion of racism.  It is important to be able to identify the hidden attack, so you can understand, and resist the attacker's effort to manipulate you.   

Self-Defense Tactics 

Dealing with these kinds of attacks can be complex, but we can suggest a few options that are likely to disrupt the attack. 

1. The Disrupting  Question 

The general principle underlying this technique is that you want to do something somewhat unexpected, while at the same time, acknowledging the implied insult.  It is important not to defend and not to be too passive. 

The disrupting question follows the following form: 

Most Workplace Conflict IS Preventable Learn how from Conflict Prevention In The Workplace - The Book.

A lot of workplace conflict comes from HOW people interact. By changing how you speak you can prevent unnecessary destructive conflict from happening.

It's much easier to prevent conflict than manage it once it begins.

Conflict Prevention In The Workplace teaches you how-step by step.

Free preview available. Click here for more information about Conflict Prevention In The Workplace -- Using Cooperative Communication

When did you start thinking that....? 

where the end of the question relates to the unspoken insult or attack.  For example, faced with the attack implying racism, disrupting questions might be: 

When did you start thinking that we allow your ethnic background to influence our behaviour? 

When did you start thinking that I am discriminating against you? 

Both of these questions are likely to cause the attacker to become a bit confused and have to stop the attack so that he or she can figure out what to say next.  This kind of response brings control back to you.  In addition, these questions acknowledge, and respond to the issue brought up by the customer in a polite way.   

2. Computer Mode 

An attacker will often expect you to respond using an "I" statement (eg. I'm not racist), or a "You" statement (eg. "You can't talk to me that way"). 

You have a third option, that involves doing the unexpected.  This option involves using what we call "computer mode" because it is somewhat detached, and removes the personalization from the attack.  It does not involve I or You statements. 

Some forms to remember include: 

"It's interesting that some people think that [their ethnic background affects the way they are treated]." 

"A good many people think that [government employees are over-paid]" 

Note again that these responses will be unexpected by the attacker, and while they show that you heard the attack, they do not imply that you agree, or that your are defending or attacking.   

Conclusion: 

We have described two simple verbal responses to verbal attacks that tend to interrupt the attack cycle.  Of course, there are other techniques that can be used, and it is important to realize that any attack defusing techniques must be applied with care and good judgement, since every situation is different.  These techniques, coupled with others, can result in increasing your ability to deal with the hostile bait. 

  
2000 - 2009 © Copyright Bacal & Associates Our Privacy Policy